[updated 12/23/12]
One was more than a little disappointed to read the current
Ref21 website headline article, “It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year” by
Mr. Hays, (which has since been superseded by an article on the Newton school shooting. Digging around even further, we did find two excellent articles by Roy Blackwood, Reforming Your Bible Study and The Exercise.)
While it is well enough written as far as it goes, it evades
the real question regarding the celebration of Christmas among evangelically
confessional churches, at least the presbyterian. IOW “invidious associations”
of paganism, popery or partying upon the holiday are not of the essence
of a principled concern or objection from Scripture.
Rather the P&R churches, contra the Lutheran
or Anglican, understand the good and necessary consequences of the Second Commandment to be that ‘whatsoever is not commanded – explicitly or implicitly
in Scripture – is forbidden in the worship of God’. In other words, what is
called the Regulative Principle of Worship (RPW). Thus the Larger, Shorter and
Heidelberg Catechisms on the Second Commandment and the Westminster Confession Chapt. 21 On Religious Worship, if not also the Belgic Confession Art. 32 Of
the Order and Discipline of the Church.
Consequently as the Appendix to the Westminster Assembly’s Directory of Worship states, “Festival days, vulgarly called Holy-days,
having no warrant in the word of God, are not to be continued”. “No warrant” as
in “uncommanded”. And if uncommanded, forbidden.
Again, while we are commanded in Scripture to observe Christ’s
resurrection once a week, not once a year at Easter – that is after all
the reason for the switch from the seventh to the first day when it comes
to the 4th commandment – and his death in the Lord’s Supper,
we are never commanded to observe or celebrate his birth whatever the
associations it might have for us, sentimentally or culturally
notwithstanding.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
An Open Letter to Andy Williams – Or Just Say No to Noël
Saturday, November 17, 2012
The Problem with Propaganda/Rap
Propaganda's rap/song is still
making the rounds, as well as waves these days with heavyweights like
Joel Beeke and Thabiti Anyabwile weighing in either on it or Jonathan
Edwards's defense of a fellow slave holding minister. Props considers
the Puritans to be hypocrites on slavery and is critical of the modern
reformed love for them. Yet the problem with propaganda is just that . .
. it's propaganda.
This Just In
But what else is new? If the essence of propaganda or a half truth is that it contains
enough of the truth to convince somebody that it is the whole truth,
then good enough buddy, let's go for it. So, lemme see, before we found out that The some Puritans
puritans approved of slavery, if not owned slaves, we learned the same
things regarding the Puritans and Ye Burning of Ye Olde Witches. Or
Calvin executing Servetus. With his bare hands no less. (I think the
Big P's reference to 'slave ship chaplains' had something maybe to do
with John Newton, who was a captain, not a chaplain, that eventually
repudiated the slave trade.) The point being in all of this, is that
slavery was endemic to the times, just like witch hunting and the civil
execution of heretics.
The
corresponding and salient distinction lost in all the noise is that
while Christians engaged in what are now reprobated activities - and
properly so - Puritanism/Christianity is also pretty much what got rid
of them. Which somehow got left out of the song, due to poetic license,
no doubt. Or is that the license of propaganda?
Monday, February 06, 2012
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who’s the Biggest Racist of Them All?
(updated 2/17/12)
Not Ron Paul (unless Voddie Baucham don't have a clue) or even the Newt Gingrich in the recent Repuglican debate. Rather we know that those who criticize Paul for not reading his 20 year old newsletters, can't be anybody -- mainstream media or member of Congress - involved with passing the Patriot Act, the TARP Bailout or ObamaCare, all of which were "Too Big to Read". In other words, for one, we're talking major mainstream hypocrisy.
More Smoke and Mirrors
Not Ron Paul (unless Voddie Baucham don't have a clue) or even the Newt Gingrich in the recent Repuglican debate. Rather we know that those who criticize Paul for not reading his 20 year old newsletters, can't be anybody -- mainstream media or member of Congress - involved with passing the Patriot Act, the TARP Bailout or ObamaCare, all of which were "Too Big to Read". In other words, for one, we're talking major mainstream hypocrisy.
More Smoke and Mirrors
Two, even if Paul or the Newt was the Great Grand Dragon of the Klu Klux Klan and they're not, the dubious honor of being the biggest racist just might be reserved for the present occupant of the big white house on Pennsylvania Ave. who still hasn't got around to telling anybody what he was doing sitting for twenty years in what could be called the black version of KKK church.
Which is to say, it just goes to show how far education in the government schools has been eroded if the lesson of Edgar Allen Poe's Purloined Letter doesn't cause some lights to go on for the media, which has generally been in the tank for the darling incumbent, who is incapable of doing any wrong. That, while the same media again has only been capable of smearing someone as a racist if they dare to question their golden boy, if not Goldman Sachs Candidate No.1 - as compared to Goldman Sachs Candidate No. 2, Mitt "Obamalite" Romney. Which is perhaps why some refer to members of the mainstream press by the vulgar term of press-titutes.
at 12:24 PM Labels: black liberation theology, Enlightenment, Fascist, NDAA, Obama, original sin, racism, republicans, Romney, Ron Paul, socialism, totalitarian, utopia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)